Search for: All records

Waterfalls are often interpreted as transient, upstream‐propagating features that mark changes in external conditions. Thus, waterfalls are commonly used to infer past tectonic and climatic forcing, making understanding the controls on waterfall erosion central to predicting how external perturbations move through landscapes. Surprisingly, there exist few direct field measurements of waterfall erosion, and existing waterfall retreat measurements are rarely paired with measurements of waterfall morphology and frequency, which, theory suggests, modulate retreat rates. This lack of data limits our ability to test existing theory and explore how waterfalls alter reach‐scale bedrock erosion rates. Here, we use cosmogenic¹⁰Be accumulated in bedrock riverbeds to measure erosion rates in fluvial reaches with varying waterfall frequency and morphology. We find that waterfall‐rich reaches erode one to five times faster than the landscape average, and that reach‐averaged erosion rates increase with increasing waterfall frequency. We develop a new, process‐based model combining waterfall and planar‐channel erosion to explore mechanistic controls on the relative erosion rate between waterfall‐rich and waterfall‐free reaches. This model predicts that reach‐averaged erosion rates increase with waterfall frequency at low sediment supply, consistent with our field measurements, but that waterfalls can also slow reach‐averaged erosion rates for high sediment supply, large grain sizes, low water discharge, or large plunge pools. Our work is consistent with previous suggestions that waterfall erosion rates may decrease in low drainage areas and can influence long‐profile morphology. 

Silicate weathering and organic carbon (OC) burial in soil regulate atmospheric CO2, but their influence on each other remains unclear. Generally, OC oxidation can generate acids that drive silicate weathering, yet clay minerals that form during weathering can protect OC and limit oxidation. This poses a conundrum where clay formation and OC preservation either compete or cooperate. Debate remains about their relative contributions because quantitative tools to simultaneously probe these processes are lacking while those that exist are often not measured in concert. Here we demonstrate that Li isotope ratios of sediment, commonly used to trace clay formation, can help constrain OC cycling. Measurements of river suspended sediment from two watersheds of varying physiography and analysis of published data from Hawaii soil profiles show negative correlations between solid-phase d7Li values and OC content, indicating the association of clay mineral formation with OC accumulation. Yet, the localities differ in their ranges of d7Li values and OC contents, which we interpret with a model of soil formation. We find that temporal trends of Li isotopes and OC are most sensitive to mineral dissolution/clay formation rates, where higher rates yield greater OC stocks and lower d7Li values. Whereas OC-enhanced dissolution primarily dictates turnover times of OC and silicate minerals, clay protection distinctly modifies soil formation pathways and is likely required to explain the range of observations. These findings underscore clay mineral formation, driven primarily by bedrock chemistry and secondarily by climate, as a principal modulator of weathering fluxes and OC accumulation in soil. 

Abstract Waterfalls can form due to external perturbation of river base level, lithologic heterogeneity, and internal feedbacks (i.e., autogenic dynamics). While waterfalls formed by lithologic heterogeneity and external perturbation are well documented, there is a lack of criteria with which to identify autogenic waterfalls, thereby limiting the ability to assess the influence of autogenic waterfalls on landscape evolution. We propose that autogenic waterfalls evolve from bedrock bedforms known as cyclic steps and therefore form as a series of steps with spacing and height set primarily by channel slope. We identified 360 waterfalls split between a transient and steady-state portion of the San Gabriel Mountains in California, USA. Our results show that while waterfalls have different spatial distributions in the transient and steady-state landscapes, waterfalls in both landscapes tend to form at slopes >3%, coinciding with the onset of Froude supercritical flow, and the waterfall height to spacing ratio in both landscapes increases with slope, consistent with cyclic step theory and flume experiments. We suggest that in unglaciated mountain ranges with relatively uniform rock strength, individual waterfalls are predominately autogenic in origin, while the spatial distribution of waterfalls may be set by external perturbations. 

Abstract River profiles are shaped by climatic and tectonic history, lithology, and internal feedbacks between flow hydraulics, sediment transport and erosion. In steep channels, waterfalls may self‐form without changes in external forcing (i.e., autogenic formation) and erode at rates faster or slower than an equivalent channel without waterfalls. We use a 1‐D numerical model to investigate how self‐formed waterfalls alter the morphology of bedrock river longitudinal profiles. We modify the standard stream power model to include a slope threshold above which waterfalls spontaneously form and a rate constant allowing waterfalls to erode faster or slower than other fluvial processes. Using this model, we explore how waterfall formation alters both steady state and transient longitudinal profile forms. Our model predicts that fast waterfalls create km‐scale reaches in a dynamic equilibrium with channel slope held approximately constant at the threshold slope for waterfall formation, while slow waterfalls can create local channel slope maxima at the location of slow waterfall development. Furthermore, slow waterfall profiles integrate past base level histories, leading to multiple possible profile forms, even at steady‐state. Consistency between our model predictions and field observations of waterfall‐rich rivers in the Kings and Kaweah drainages in the southern Sierra Nevada, California, supports the hypothesis that waterfall formation can modulate river profiles in nature. Our findings may help identify how bedrock channels are influenced by waterfall erosion and aid in distinguishing between signatures of external and internal perturbations, thereby strengthening our ability to interpret past climate and tectonic changes from river longitudinal profiles.